Navy maximum allowable body fat standards age group. Hodgdon and marcie b.
How To Measure Body Fat Using The Us Navy Method 10 Steps
How accurate is us navy body fat calculator. 40 female 36 male 26 standard navy methods for determining. 18 21 female 33 male 22 age group. If youre wondering about the navy method accuracy it is a pretty good estimator of body fat. For me personally it is very accurate when i compared it to my dexa scan. This is the difference between being useless and helpful. Heres that us navy formula.
Click the customize button above to learn more. Density 0191 log 10 waist neck 0155 log 10 height 1032 bf 100 495 density 45 women. 22 29 female 34 male 23 age group. If you use the us navy equation and get a reading of 20 your actual body fat could be anywhere from 17 23. Keep in mind that even the most accurate ways of measuring body fat have a degree of error to them. The navy body fat criteria for navy is very strict so no chances should be taken in this regard.
The water displacement test is the most accurate way to determine body fat percent but the navy body fat test or ymca formula is accurate within 1 3 for most people. If you want to customize the colors size and more to better fit your site then pricing starts at just 2999 for a one time purchase. Use a tape measure then enter your waist hip and neck measurements. These equations are formulated by james a. This tool sets the highest standards of accuracy. In us navy is using separate equations for men and women to calculate the percentage of body fat.
None of the results have to be double checked by the user. Run as a popup link to this calculator. Once the calculator has produced the results the user can count on them easily without any doubt. So if you use a bia machine and get a reading of 20 your actual body fat could be anywhere from 1228. 30 39 female 35 male 24 age group. It is also helpful to know your bmi use our bmi calculator to find the answer.
The us navy body fat calculator exactly as you see it above is 100 free for you to use. Comparisons with two compartment fat produced a correlation coefficient of 082 standard error of measurement of 415 fat and a mean difference of 322 fat.